Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 06:14:36AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > x86-64 doesn't load the segment registers at all before use. > > Yes, before switching to 64bit long mode we never do any data access. We do a > stack access to clear eflags only while we still run in legacy mode with paging > disabled and so we only rely on ss to be valid when the bootloader jumps at > 0x100000 for executing the head.S code (and not anymore on the gdt_48 layout). Actually it just occurred to me that this stack assess is buggy. You haven't set up a stack yet so. Only the boot/compressed/head.S did and that location isn't safe to use. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i... Andi Kleen
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i... Andi Kleen
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test1... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test1... Jeff Garzik
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test1... Werner Almesberger
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2 Peter Samuelson
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2 Andi Kleen
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2 Thomas Köhler
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2 Robert Lynch