On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 04:44:17PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > The current simulator seems to be buggy in that it checks the SS,DS segments >that were pushed as part of the interrupt stack on iretd [..] That's the first thing I thought too indeed 8), but it maybe because at iret time the CPU doesn't know if it will have to return to compatibility mode or not. If we feed the ss/ds with a 32bit compatibility mode data segment all should work right as well (this should be verified on the simulator though). Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2 Tigran Aivazian
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Andi Kleen
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Andi Kleen
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pr... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2 Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
- Re: bzImage ~ 900K with i386 test11-pre2 Jeff Garzik