Could you please fix you mailer to not unwrap the emails? On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:47:40AM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > >Provide refcount_t, an atomic_t like primitive built just for > >refcounting. It provides overflow and underflow checks as well as > >saturation semantics such that when it overflows, we'll never attempt > >to free it again, ever. > > >Peter do you have the changes to the refcount_t interface compare to > >the version in this patch? We are now starting working on atomic_t > >--> refcount_t conversions and it would save a bit of work to have > >latest version from you that we can be based upon. > > Oh, and if we define refcount_t to be just atomic_t underneath, what > about the other atomic_long_t, local_t and atomic64_t cases when it is > used for recounting? I don't feel good just simply changing them to > become atomic_t under refcount_t wrapper.....
Is there anybody using local_t ? That seems 'creative' and highly questionable. As for atomic_long_t there's very few, I'd leave them be for now, and I couldn't find a single atomic64_t refcount user.
