CC Xiaolong.

On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 07:46:28PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
2016-11-10 02:42+0800, kbuild test robot:
Hi Radim,

And I even replied to the series, so this would happen ...
Btw. would the tool recognize it if the header was [PATCH v4 4/4]?

[auto build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc4 next-20161109]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help 
improve the system]

url:    
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Radim-Kr-m/KVM-x86-emulate-FXSAVE-and-FXRSTOR/20161110-021048
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git linux-next
config: x86_64-randconfig-x018-201645 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c: In function 'em_fxsave':
>> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:3910:7: error: implicit declaration of function 
'asm_safe' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     rc = asm_safe("fxsave %[fx]", , [fx] "+m"(fx_state));
          ^~~~~~~~
>> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:3910:32: error: expected expression before ',' token
     rc = asm_safe("fxsave %[fx]", , [fx] "+m"(fx_state));
                                   ^
>> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:3910:35: error: 'fx' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
     rc = asm_safe("fxsave %[fx]", , [fx] "+m"(fx_state));
                                      ^~
   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:3910:35: note: each undeclared identifier is reported 
only once for each function it appears in
   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c: In function 'fxrstor_fixup':
   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:3931:32: error: expected expression before ',' token
     rc = asm_safe("fxsave %[fx]", , [fx] "+m"(old));
                                   ^
   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:3931:35: error: 'fx' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
     rc = asm_safe("fxsave %[fx]", , [fx] "+m"(old));
                                      ^~
   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c: In function 'em_fxrstor':
>> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:3977:34: error: expected expression before ':' token
      rc = asm_safe("fxrstor %[fx]", : [fx] "m"(fx_state));
                                     ^
   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c: At top level:
>> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:4336:12: error: 'Aligned16' undeclared here (not in a 
function)
     I(ModRM | Aligned16, em_fxsave),
               ^
   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:4185:31: note: in definition of macro 'I'
    #define I(_f, _e) { .flags = (_f), .u.execute = (_e) }
                                  ^~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/asm_safe +3910 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c

  3904          rc = check_fxsr(ctxt);
  3905          if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
  3906                  return rc;
  3907  
  3908          ctxt->ops->get_fpu(ctxt);
  3909  
> 3910               rc = asm_safe("fxsave %[fx]", , [fx] "+m"(fx_state));
  3911  
  3912          ctxt->ops->put_fpu(ctxt);
  3913  
  3914          if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
  3915                  return rc;
  3916  
  3917          if (ctxt->ops->get_cr(ctxt, 4) & X86_CR4_OSFXSR)
  3918                  size = offsetof(struct fxregs_state, xmm_space[8 * 
16/4]);
  3919          else
  3920                  size = offsetof(struct fxregs_state, xmm_space[0]);
  3921  
  3922          return segmented_write(ctxt, ctxt->memop.addr.mem, &fx_state, 
size);
  3923  }
  3924  
  3925  static int fxrstor_fixup(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
  3926                  struct fxregs_state *new)
  3927  {
  3928          int rc = X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
  3929          struct fxregs_state old;
  3930  
> 3931               rc = asm_safe("fxsave %[fx]", , [fx] "+m"(old));
  3932          if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
  3933                  return rc;
  3934  
  3935          /*
  3936           * 64 bit host will restore XMM 8-15, which is not correct on 
non-64
  3937           * bit guests.  Load the current values in order to preserve 64 
bit
  3938           * XMMs after fxrstor.
  3939           */
  3940  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
  3941          /* XXX: accessing XMM 8-15 very awkwardly */
  3942          memcpy(&new->xmm_space[8 * 16/4], &old.xmm_space[8 * 16/4], 8 * 
16);
  3943  #endif
  3944  
  3945          /*
  3946           * Hardware doesn't save and restore XMM 0-7 without 
CR4.OSFXSR, but
  3947           * does save and restore MXCSR.
  3948           */
  3949          if (!(ctxt->ops->get_cr(ctxt, 4) & X86_CR4_OSFXSR))
  3950                  memcpy(new->xmm_space, old.xmm_space, 8 * 16);
  3951  
  3952          return rc;
  3953  }
  3954  
  3955  static int em_fxrstor(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
  3956  {
  3957          struct fxregs_state fx_state;
  3958          int rc;
  3959  
  3960          rc = check_fxsr(ctxt);
  3961          if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
  3962                  return rc;
  3963  
  3964          rc = segmented_read(ctxt, ctxt->memop.addr.mem, &fx_state, 512);
  3965          if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
  3966                  return rc;
  3967  
  3968          if (fx_state.mxcsr >> 16)
  3969                  return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0);
  3970  
  3971          ctxt->ops->get_fpu(ctxt);
  3972  
  3973          if (ctxt->mode < X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64)
  3974                  rc = fxrstor_fixup(ctxt, &fx_state);
  3975  
  3976          if (rc == X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> 3977                       rc = asm_safe("fxrstor %[fx]", : [fx] 
"m"(fx_state));
  3978  
  3979          ctxt->ops->put_fpu(ctxt);
  3980  

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Reply via email to