On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:47:38AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: Christogh Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> 
> Only calculate the affinity for the main I/O vectors, and skip the
> pre or post vectors specified by struct irq_affinity.
> 
> Also remove the irq_affinity cpumask argument that has never been used.
> If we ever need it in the future we can pass it through struct
> irq_affinity.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christogh Hellwig <h...@lst.de>

s/Christogh/Christoph/ (also above, and maybe other patches too?)

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>

> ---
>  drivers/pci/msi.c         |  4 ++--
>  include/linux/interrupt.h |  4 ++--
>  kernel/irq/affinity.c     | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index c58d3c2..1761b8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, bool 
> affinity)
>       u16 control;
>  
>       if (affinity) {
> -             masks = irq_create_affinity_masks(dev->irq_affinity, nvec);
> +             masks = irq_create_affinity_masks(nvec, NULL);
>               if (!masks)
>                       pr_err("Unable to allocate affinity masks, ignoring\n");
>       }
> @@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ static int msix_setup_entries(struct pci_dev *dev, void 
> __iomem *base,
>       int ret, i;
>  
>       if (affinity) {
> -             masks = irq_create_affinity_masks(dev->irq_affinity, nvec);
> +             masks = irq_create_affinity_masks(nvec, NULL);
>               if (!masks)
>                       pr_err("Unable to allocate affinity masks, ignoring\n");

Not caused by this patch, but can we use dev_err() here and above?

Reply via email to