On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 01:00:04PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> mmdc of i.MX6QP are little difference with i.MX6Q.
> added new compatible stream fsl,imx6qp-mmdc

s/stream/string

> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <frank...@nxp.com>
> ---
> No change for this patch.
> suspend resume code need fsl,imx6q-mmdc

You should probably add such info into commit log, e.g. although
MMDC has a slightly different programming model between imx6q and imx6qp
in terms of perf support, it's exactly same for suspend support, so we
have fsl,imx6q-mmdc here to save patching suspend driver with the new
compatible.

> 
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp.dtsi | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp.dtsi
> index 886dbf2..e0fdd0f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp.dtsi
> @@ -85,5 +85,12 @@
>               pcie: pcie@0x01000000 {
>                       compatible = "fsl,imx6qp-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie";
>               };
> +
> +             aips-bus@02100000 {
> +                     mmdc0: mmdc@021b0000 { /* MMDC0 */
> +                             compatible = "fsl,imx6qp-mmdc", 
> "fsl,imx6q-mmdc";
> +                             reg = <0x021b0000 0x4000>;
> +                     };
> +             };

It seems that pcie already went wrong, but please still try to add
devices in order of unit-address.

Shawn

>       };
>  };
> -- 
> 2.5.2
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Reply via email to