On 10/20/2016 02:51 PM, Andy Gross wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:18:33PM -0700, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
On 10/20/2016 12:56 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Thu 20 Oct 11:56 PDT 2016, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:

From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>

Add SMEM and TCSR DT nodes on MSM8996.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjo...@codeaurora.org>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi 
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
index 949b096..0a810f5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
@@ -169,12 +169,31 @@
                method = "smc";
        };

+       smem {
+               compatible = "qcom,smem";
+
+               memory-region = <&smem_mem>;
+
+               hwlocks = <&tcsr_mutex 3>;
+       };
+
        soc: soc {
                #address-cells = <1>;
                #size-cells = <1>;
                ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
                compatible = "simple-bus";

+               tcsr_mutex_regs: syscon@740000 {
+                       compatible = "syscon";
+                       reg = <0x740000 0x20000>;
+               };
+
+               tcsr_mutex: hwlock {
+                       compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex";
+                       syscon = <&tcsr_mutex_regs 0 0x1000>;
+                       #hwlock-cells = <1>;
+               };

Sorry, I got this in the wrong place, the hwlock node should sit outside
of soc {} - looks like we got this wrong in msm8916 as well.

Thanks for reviewing the patch. Do you mean to move it under / {}; (i.e.
root)?

Yes.  Any node that doesn't have reg properties should go under the root.


Got it. Will update the patch(es) and add cover letter. Thanks.


Andy


Regards,
Sarang
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to