On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Jörg Otte <jrg.o...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-10-19 17:29 GMT+02:00 Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>: >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:07 AM, Jörg Otte <jrg.o...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Additional info: I usally use schedutil governor. >>> If I switch to performance governor problems go away. >>> Maybe a cpufreq problem? >> >> Oh, I completely misread the original bug report, and then didn't read >> your confirmation email right. >> >> I thought you had a slower build of the different kernels (when >> building on the same kernel), and that the _build_ itself had slowed >> down for some reason. But you're actually saying that doing the _same_ >> build actually takes longer when running on 4.9-rc1. > > Exactly! > > Btw: ondemand governor is also good. > >> There are a few small cpufreq changes there in between commit >> 29fbff8698fc (that you reported was fine - please tell me I got _that_ >> right, at least?) and 4.9-rc1. > > Perfect! That's what I mean. > >> Adding Rafael to the cc. >> >> That said, none of them look all that likely to me. It *would* be good >> if you could bisect it a bit (perhaps not fully, but a couple of >> bisection steps to narrow down what area it is). > > I try that tomorrow. >
I switched over to ***schedutil*** as default-cpufreq-governor with v4.8 in my init-scripts. Didn't try any other cpufreq-governor and had no time to play more with this issue. - Sedat -
