On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 11:46 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > I could go with either method I suppose, but I don't personally like > the > idea of splitting out the various bits of MTD into *completely* > independent lines of development. As long as someone (not necessarily > me) can manage pulling the sub-subsystems together, I think it would > make sense to have 1 PR for Linus for non-UBI/FS MTD changes.
I think this is a good point. MTD is pretty much a "don't care" subsystem for Linus, an I do not think he'll appreciate 2 or more micro MTD pull requests. It makes a lot more sense to consolidate all this under a single tree MTD tree and make a single pull request.
