On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> @@ -176,6 +177,11 @@ static int acpi_register_lapic(int id, u
>>          return -EINVAL;
>>      }
>>
>> +    if (!enabled && (id == disabled_id)) {
>> +        ++disabled_cpus;
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +    }
>
> Why would you need that disabled_id thing at all? The proper fix is to let
> the apic driver detect the issue and this boils down to a 5 lines
> change. Does the patch below fix the issue for you?
> 8<----------------
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -2076,6 +2076,11 @@ int __generic_processor_info(int apicid,
>         bool boot_cpu_detected = physid_isset(boot_cpu_physical_apicid,
>                                 phys_cpu_present_map);
>
> +       if (!apic->apic_id_valid(apicid)) {
> +               disabled_cpus++;
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
>         /*
>          * boot_cpu_physical_apicid is designed to have the apicid
>          * returned by read_apic_id(), i.e, the apicid of the
>
>

No, That does not fix the issue.

the system have x2apic pre_enabled from BIOS, so at the time
apic is set to &apic_x2apic_cluster.

early_acpi_boot_init ==> early_acpi_process_madt ==> acpi_parse_madt
==> default_acpi_madt_oem_check

default_acpi_madt_oem_check
      ==> apic_x2apic_cluster/x2apic_acpi_madt_oem_check ==> x2apic_enabled
      ==> apic = &apic_x2apic_cluster

and
static int x2apic_apic_id_valid(int apicid)
{
        return 1;
}

To make your change work, may need to update x2apic_apic_id_valid to

static int x2apic_apic_id_valid(int apicid)
{
        if (apicid == 0xff || apicid == -1)
            return 0;

        return 1;
}


Thanks

Yinghai

Reply via email to