On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:11:55 +0100
Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> How about this?

I still don't understand this bug.

> Solves the FUSE deadlock, but not the throttle_vm_writeout() one.
> I'll try to tackle that one as well.
> 
> If the per-bdi dirty counter goes below 16, balance_dirty_pages()
> returns.
> 
> Does the constant need to tunable?  If it's too large, then the global
> threshold is more easily exceeded.  If it's too small, then in a tight
> situation progress will be slower.
> 
> Thanks,
> Miklos
> 
> Index: linux/mm/page-writeback.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/mm/page-writeback.c    2007-02-19 17:32:41.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/mm/page-writeback.c 2007-02-19 18:05:28.000000000 +0100
> @@ -198,6 +198,25 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
>                       dirty_thresh)
>                               break;
>  
> +             /*
> +              * Acquit this producer if there's little or nothing
> +              * to write back to this particular queue
> +              *
> +              * Without this check a deadlock is possible in the
> +              * following case:
> +              *
> +              * - filesystem A writes data through filesystem B
> +              * - filesystem A has dirty pages over dirty_thresh
> +              * - writeback is started, this triggers a write in B
> +              * - balance_dirty_pages() is called synchronously
> +              * - the write to B blocks
> +              * - the writeback completes, but dirty is still over threshold
> +              * - the blocking write prevents futher writes from happening
> +              */
> +             if (atomic_long_read(&bdi->nr_dirty) +
> +                 atomic_long_read(&bdi->nr_writeback) < 16)
> +                     break;
> +

The problem seems to that little "- the write to B blocks".

How come it blocks?  I mean, if we cannot retire writes to that filesystem
then we're screwed anyway.

Anyway, I think I'll think about this issue a little later on.  You might
as well prepare full changelogs for your proposed changes, because we'll be
needing them anyway.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to