Hi Linus,
On 09/15/2016 04:18 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hi Linus,
On 09/15/2016 03:19 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote:
On 09/14/2016 12:19 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote:
So, in other words, lots of bugs here. Nevertheless, I would suggest to
keep
using postcore_initcall(), at least until it is sure that all gpio
clients handle
-EPROBE_DEFER
correctly.
So can I just revert this patch in isolation? None of the other patches
depend on it?
Good question, if this was part of a series.
No response from author, so betting on it and reverting this in isolation
with your Reported-by.
please revert the revert :)
ok, the problem is recognized, but as I said it is not sufficient to revert
only that change, if it is selected to go by path of reverts commit
("gpio: mxc: add generic gpio request/free callbacks to pinctrl") from
your for-next branch should be reverted as well, the latter commit depends
on the reverted commit.
I have one i.MX31 powered board on hand, I'll start preparing a proper
fix for the issue.
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
