[PATCH] x86: Put the num_processors++ code in a more suitable position

[Dou Liyang]

This is a code optimization.

If checking the topology package map of apicid and cpu is failure,
it will stop generating the processor info for that apicid and the
disabled_cpus will plus one. However, the num-processors has already
been added one above. That may cause the number of processors incorrect.

Just put the num_processors++ code in the more suitable position.
it makes sure that the num-processors will not conflict with the
disabled_cpus.

Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
index 50c95af..f3e9b2d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -2093,7 +2093,6 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
                return -EINVAL;
        }
 
-       num_processors++;
        if (apicid == boot_cpu_physical_apicid) {
                /*
                 * x86_bios_cpu_apicid is required to have processors listed
@@ -2116,10 +2115,13 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
 
                pr_warning("APIC: Package limit reached. Processor %d/0x%x 
ignored.\n",
                           thiscpu, apicid);
+
                disabled_cpus++;
                return -ENOSPC;
        }
 
+       num_processors++;
+
        /*
         * Validate version
         */
-- 
2.5.5