Petr, one more question. Not related to the patch, but still related to NMI.
can NMI nest? CPU0 -> NMI#0 printk_nmi_enter() this_cpu_write(printk_func, vprintk_nmi) ... => NMI#1 : printk_nmi_enter() : this_cpu_write(printk_func, vprintk_nmi) : this_cpu_read(printk_func)(fmt, args) : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ OK, vprintk_nmi() from NMI : printk_nmi_exit() : this_cpu_write(printk_func, vprintk_default) << return NMI#1 this_cpu_read(printk_func)(fmt, args) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ vprintk_default() from NMI? printk_nmi_exit() this_cpu_write(printk_func, vprintk_default) return NMI#0 can this happen? shouldn't we do something like this then? /* not tested */ Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com> --- kernel/printk/internal.h | 2 ++ kernel/printk/nmi.c | 9 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/printk/internal.h b/kernel/printk/internal.h index 7fd2838..5b7508f 100644 --- a/kernel/printk/internal.h +++ b/kernel/printk/internal.h @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ extern raw_spinlock_t logbuf_lock; * via per-CPU variable. */ DECLARE_PER_CPU(printk_func_t, printk_func); +DECLARE_PER_CPU(printk_func_t, printk_func_saved); + static inline __printf(1, 0) int vprintk_func(const char *fmt, va_list args) { return this_cpu_read(printk_func)(fmt, args); diff --git a/kernel/printk/nmi.c b/kernel/printk/nmi.c index 16bab47..9d83929 100644 --- a/kernel/printk/nmi.c +++ b/kernel/printk/nmi.c @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ * were handled or when IRQs are blocked. */ DEFINE_PER_CPU(printk_func_t, printk_func) = vprintk_default; +DEFINE_PER_CPU(printk_func_t, printk_func_saved); static int printk_nmi_irq_ready; atomic_t nmi_message_lost; @@ -259,10 +260,16 @@ void __init printk_nmi_init(void) void printk_nmi_enter(void) { + printk_func_t func = this_cpu_read(printk_func); + + if (func != vprintk_nmi) + this_cpu_write(printk_func_saved, func); this_cpu_write(printk_func, vprintk_nmi); } void printk_nmi_exit(void) { - this_cpu_write(printk_func, vprintk_default); + printk_func_t func = this_cpu_read(printk_func_saved); + + this_cpu_write(printk_func, func); } -- 2.9.3