On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote:
> The frame at the end of each idle task stack has a zeroed return
> address.  This is inconsistent with real task stacks, which have a real
> return address at that spot.  This inconsistency can be confusing for
> stack unwinders.
>
> Make it a real address by using the side effect of a call instruction to
> push the instruction pointer on the stack.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> index 3621ad2..c90f481 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> @@ -298,8 +298,9 @@ ENTRY(start_cpu)
>          *      REX.W + FF /5 JMP m16:64 Jump far, absolute indirect,
>          *              address given in m16:64.
>          */
> -       movq    initial_code(%rip),%rax
> -       pushq   $0              # fake return address to stop unwinder
> +       call    1f              # put return address on stack for unwinder
> +1:     xorq    %rbp, %rbp      # clear frame pointer
> +       movq    initial_code(%rip), %rax
>         pushq   $__KERNEL_CS    # set correct cs
>         pushq   %rax            # target address in negative space
>         lretq
> --
> 2.7.4
>

Seems reasonable.

Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>

--Andy

Reply via email to