On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:44:52AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > This change achieves up to 10% of speed-up for cpudl_set() calls, as > measured with a andomly generated workload of 1K,10K,100K random heap > insertions and deletions (75% cpudl_set() calls with is_valid=1 and > 25% with is_valid=0), and randomly generated cpu IDs, with up to 256 > CPUs, as measured on an Intel Core2 Duo.
Changelog fails to explain _what_ the change is. Some details on the change in implementation and why this is faster would be good.
