The current semantics of do_resq() is to do a intptr_t type store in
successful cases, however, in test_percpu_{inc,spinlock}, we use
test_data_entry::count as the location to store, whose type is int.

intptr_t and int have different size on LP64 systems, and despite the
inconsistency of types, having test_data_entry::count as int needs more
care on endian handling.

To make things simpler and more consistent, convert
test_data_entry::count to type intptr_t, which also makes the coming
tests for ppc64le and ppc64 share the same code.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.f...@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
index f95fba5a1b2a..db25e0a818e5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ struct percpu_lock {
 };
 
 struct test_data_entry {
-       int count;
+       intptr_t count;
 } __attribute__((aligned(128)));
 
 struct spinlock_test_data {
@@ -234,7 +234,8 @@ void *test_percpu_spinlock_thread(void *arg)
 void test_percpu_spinlock(void)
 {
        const int num_threads = opt_threads;
-       int i, sum, ret;
+       int i, ret;
+       intptr_t sum;
        pthread_t test_threads[num_threads];
        struct spinlock_test_data data;
        struct spinlock_thread_test_data thread_data[num_threads];
@@ -308,7 +309,8 @@ void *test_percpu_inc_thread(void *arg)
 void test_percpu_inc(void)
 {
        const int num_threads = opt_threads;
-       int i, sum, ret;
+       int i, ret;
+       intptr_t sum;
        pthread_t test_threads[num_threads];
        struct inc_test_data data;
        struct inc_thread_test_data thread_data[num_threads];
-- 
2.9.0

Reply via email to