On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 01:49:57 PM Paolo Bonzini wrote: > People complain about the driver saying there's no valid RAPL domains > in a VM, and doing so at KERN_ERR severity. Downgrade this to KERN_INFO > if running on a hypervisor, since it is basically stating the obvious. > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> > Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > --- > First sent out about a year ago. :) > > drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c > index b2766b867b0e..0a0b09910116 100644 > --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c > +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c > @@ -1392,7 +1392,9 @@ static int rapl_detect_domains(struct rapl_package *rp, > int cpu) > } > rp->nr_domains = bitmap_weight(&rp->domain_map, RAPL_DOMAIN_MAX); > if (!rp->nr_domains) { > - pr_err("no valid rapl domains found in package %d\n", rp->id); > + printk("%sNo valid RAPL domains found in package %d\n", > + boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR) ? KERN_INFO : > KERN_ERR, > + rp->id);
But we print that message with pr_debug() now (as in linux-next). Do you still want to do anything about that? > ret = -ENODEV; > goto done; > } > Thanks, Rafael