On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 01:49:57 PM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> People complain about the driver saying there's no valid RAPL domains
> in a VM, and doing so at KERN_ERR severity.  Downgrade this to KERN_INFO
> if running on a hypervisor, since it is basically stating the obvious.
> 
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> ---
>       First sent out about a year ago. :)
> 
>  drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> index b2766b867b0e..0a0b09910116 100644
> --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> @@ -1392,7 +1392,9 @@ static int rapl_detect_domains(struct rapl_package *rp, 
> int cpu)
>       }
>       rp->nr_domains = bitmap_weight(&rp->domain_map, RAPL_DOMAIN_MAX);
>       if (!rp->nr_domains) {
> -             pr_err("no valid rapl domains found in package %d\n", rp->id);
> +             printk("%sNo valid RAPL domains found in package %d\n",
> +                    boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR) ? KERN_INFO : 
> KERN_ERR,
> +                    rp->id);

But we print that message with pr_debug() now (as in linux-next).

Do you still want to do anything about that?

>               ret = -ENODEV;
>               goto done;
>       }
> 

Thanks,
Rafael

Reply via email to