On Jul 11, 2016, at 1:18 PM, James Simmons wrote:
> With the move to iov_iter handling two issues merged
> for the ko2iblnd driver. The first fix address a simple
> typo of the wrong flag being used with iov_iter_kvec.
> The second fix adds the payload offset to the payload
> size.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimm...@infradead.org>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd_cb.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd_cb.c
> b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd_cb.c
> index 3d597dc..437e149 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd_cb.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd_cb.c
> @@ -1519,12 +1519,15 @@ kiblnd_send(lnet_ni_t *ni, void *private, lnet_msg_t
> *lntmsg)
> /* payload is either all vaddrs or all pages */
> LASSERT(!(payload_kiov && payload_iov));
>
> - if (payload_kiov)
> + if (payload_kiov) {
The braces are in fact going to make checkpatch complain that we do not
need them here.
> iov_iter_bvec(&from, ITER_BVEC | WRITE,
> - payload_kiov, payload_niov, payload_nob);
> - else
> - iov_iter_kvec(&from, ITER_BVEC | WRITE,
> - payload_iov, payload_niov, payload_nob);
> + payload_kiov, payload_niov,
> + payload_nob + payload_offset);
Why are we adding the offset to number of bytes here?
> + } else {
> + iov_iter_kvec(&from, ITER_KVEC | WRITE,
> + payload_iov, payload_niov,
> + payload_nob + payload_offset);
> + }
> iov_iter_advance(&from, payload_offset);
Ah, I guess we added it there to then subtract here?
Do you mind if I just merge this change into Al's patch with you as another
Signed-off-by line instead?
Since we caught this early, probably no point in having a breakage point in
the history as it might break a future bisect.
> switch (type) {
> --
> 2.7.4
