> From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:t...@linutronix.de] > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:07 AM > To: Yu, Fenghua <fenghua...@intel.com> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@elte.hu>; Anvin, H Peter > <h.peter.an...@intel.com>; Luck, Tony <tony.l...@intel.com>; Tejun Heo > <t...@kernel.org>; Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de>; Stephane Eranian > <eran...@google.com>; Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>; Marcelo > Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com>; David Carrillo-Cisneros > <davi...@google.com>; Shankar, Ravi V <ravi.v.shan...@intel.com>; Vikas > Shivappa <vikas.shiva...@linux.intel.com>; Prakhya, Sai Praneeth > <sai.praneeth.prak...@intel.com>; linux-kernel <linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org>; x86 <x...@kernel.org> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/32] x86/intel_rdt.c: Extend RDT to per cache and per > resources > > On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Fenghua Yu wrote: > > > From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua...@intel.com> > > > > QoS mask MSRs array is per cache. We need to allocate CLOSID per cache > > instead global CLOSID. > > > > A few different resources can share same QoS mask MSRs array. For > > example, one L2 cache can share QoS MSRs with its next level > > L3 cache. A domain number represents the L2 cache, the L3 cache, the > > L2 cache's shared cpumask, and the L3 cache's shared cpumask. > > > > cctable is extended to be index by domain number so that each cache > > has its own control table. > > > > shared_domain is introduced to cover multiple resources sharing > > CLOSID. > > This patch does a dozen different things at once. Can you please split the > cleanup parts, the parts where statics are removed and the actual changes in > the representation model apart so this can be reviewed? > > And while at this, please fold back thes cleanups into the original patches. > There is no point to have these changes seperate.
Sure. Will do this. Thanks. -Fenghua
