On Tue, 07 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > In the NIC example, I might well want the DHCP client to run whenever I > > activate the card. Bringing the NIC up with the old configuration - which, with > > dynamic IP addresses, could now include someone else's IP address! - is worse > > than useless. > > You'll notice the pcmcia subsystem already handles this, and keeps data in user > space although it doesnt support saving it back. And it all works > > In your case it would be something like > > eth0 pegasus > nopersist eth0 > post-install eth0 /usr/local/sbin/my-dhcp-stuff So, in short, this is already done perfectly well in userspace without some sort of Registry-style kernelside hack? James. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Paul Jakma
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Dan Hollis
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Petko Manolov
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alon Ziv
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Rogier Wolff
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox