On Tue, 07 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > When I plug it in and modprobe is triggered to load the driver, a script then > > runs to feed the device appropriate configuration info. Since the driver only > > resets the hardware when it is given the correct configuration, there's no > > problem. > > Thats another 100 lines of race prone network kernel code you dont need Getting rid of 100 lines of code would certainly be worth doing... Assuming I want the same configuration for the hardware as I did the last time I used it is OK - provided that assumption is NOT in the kernel. As a default behaviour in userspace, it's fine. In the NIC example, I might well want the DHCP client to run whenever I activate the card. Bringing the NIC up with the old configuration - which, with dynamic IP addresses, could now include someone else's IP address! - is worse than useless. > > Hmm... define "identical". I take a laptop home, use a USB NIC to talk to my > > Same Mac address or same serial number. So if I take the NIC with me, Linux automagically misconfigures it for me. No thanks. James. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Paul Jakma
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Dan Hollis
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Petko Manolov
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alon Ziv
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox