On Tue, 28 Jun 2016, Yury Norov wrote: > What you talk about sounds unclear to me. If you mean to unify with > one of existing ports, it looks unnecessary, as ilp32 will end up with > RISC-V anyway. If you mean to use RISC-V, it's not ready yet. I was > thinking that when they will finish, they simply switch this port to > their code. Am I too optimistic?
I mean unify in sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux (or .../generic if inappropriate for the main sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux), for all architectures, both existing and new, with conditionals based on logical features of the architectures. If any architecture has its own implementation, it should only be old architectures with their special peculiarities. > Is there glibc analogue for kernel scripts/checkpatch.pl? If yes, > please point me out, and I'll briefly fix all issues. If no please be I'm not aware of an analogue, although GCC's contrib/check_GNU_style.sh may well be helpful for some issues. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
