On 06/19, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote: > Step 1: for 4.7 and for -stable, introduce TS_I386_REGS_POKED. Set it > in putreg32. Use it in syscall_get_error, get_nr_restart_syscall, > etc. Clear it in do_signal.
do_signal() won't be necessarily called... > I wonder if we could actually get away with doing syscall restart > processing before ptrace invocation. How? this doesn't look possible or I misunderstood. How about the simple change below for now? IIRC 32-bit task can't use "syscall" so if syscall_get_nr() >= 0 then even the wrong TS_COMPAT is not that bad, even if it "leaks" to user-mode. nobody should use, say, in_ia32_syscall() unless we know that "in syscall" is actually true. Hmm, arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c does and this is wrong regardless, I'll send the fix. Oleg. --- x/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c +++ x/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ static int putreg32(struct task_struct * * exit from a 32-bit syscall with TS_COMPAT still set. */ regs->orig_ax = value; - if (syscall_get_nr(child, regs) >= 0) + if (syscall_get_nr(child, regs) >= 0 && !user_64bit_mode(regs)) task_thread_info(child)->status |= TS_COMPAT; break;