On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:07:56 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 06/18/2016 06:02 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Yuck. I should have dug in to the history. Why not just > > unconditionally sign-extend eax when set by a 32-bit tracer? > > No idea.
Roland McGrath knows why he wrote it that way, Cced. What if eax contains an address in 2GB..4GB range? I guess currently the orig_eax check tries to verify %eax cannot contain an address. Jan
