On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Rhyland Klein <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/7/2016 4:05 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Thu, 12 May 2016, Rhyland Klein wrote: >> >>> When configuring FPS during probe, assuming a DT node is present for >>> FPS, the code can run into a problem with the switch statements in >>> max77620_config_fps() and max77620_get_fps_period_reg_value(). Namely, >>> in the case of chip->chip_id == MAX77620, it will set >>> fps_[mix|max]_period but then fall through to the default switch case >>> and return -EINVAL. Returning this from max77620_config_fps() will >>> cause probe to fail. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> drivers/mfd/max77620.c | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> Applied to -fixes with Thierry and Laxman's Acks. >> > > I don't see this in linux-next yet (as of 20160614). Can we get this > merged there to.
Was about to say the same thing. FWIW: Tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]>
