* Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 12:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > In the TRM it's called Power Management Unit, though once or twice
> > > in some
> > > documents as Power Management Controller. I actually woudn't like to
> > > use PMC
> > > abbreviation to not be confused with pmc_atom.c and many other
> > > variation of
> > > existing PMC drivers of other Intel platforms.
> > >
> > > PM* as a prefix might be too short to conflict with Power Management
> > > framework
> > > in the kernel. P-Unit (punit*) is existing part in SoC which will
> > > have its own
> > > driver in the future, so, can't use it either.
> > >
> > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management Unit) —
> > > one of them?
> >
> > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?
>
> Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'.
Yeah, indeed - so pwr it is?
Thanks,
Ingo
