On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 12:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > In the TRM it's called Power Management Unit, though once or twice > > in some > > documents as Power Management Controller. I actually woudn't like to > > use PMC > > abbreviation to not be confused with pmc_atom.c and many other > > variation of > > existing PMC drivers of other Intel platforms. > > > > PM* as a prefix might be too short to conflict with Power Management > > framework > > in the kernel. P-Unit (punit*) is existing part in SoC which will > > have its own > > driver in the future, so, can't use it either. > > > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management Unit) — > > one of them? > > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?
Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'. P.S. I have sent an indentation fix as a separate patch. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy
