[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I am thinking about the bigger picture: You are unloading a driver, > then continuing to use the hardware. To me, that is an undefined > state. We're only using the pass-through levels. It's undefined but it doesn't matter to the software. I'd actually suggest that for hardware which does stop the pass-through audio when the driver is unloaded, we really ought not unload the driver while those levels are non-zero. We should still reset the hardware completely when we reload the driver - it's just that we should reset it to the levels previously set by the user, rather than resetting it to zeroes. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > However, since simply leaving the driver loaded solves all this mess, > it doesn't seem worth changing drivers to do anything different. Leaving the driver loaded has been my solution ever since kerneld was taken out. I merely commented that Keith's new stuff would allow me to get persistent storage working again. It's not very difficult to change the driver to use it. I believe the SBLive! driver is a little larger than the example you pasted. I think we probably do care about adding a little bit more to the pool of permanently unswappable pages here and there. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Paul Jakma
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Dan Hollis
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland