David Woodhouse wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > * User continues to happily listen to radio through sound card > > You're using the sound card without a driver? > > Yes. The sound card allows itself to be unloaded when the pass-through mixer > levels are non-zero. This is reasonable iff it can be reloaded without > destroying those levels again. I don't think that is reasonable. The first thing most drivers do is reset the hardware. That inevitably leads to some sort of blip, when it comes to sound drivers. If you -don't- reset the hardware, the driver is using hardware that is in an unknown state. (using hardware w/out resetting it == unknown state) You are depending on the hardware to keep its state -between- driver unload and driver reload. That seems inherently unstable to me. It amazes me that such is supported. Jeff -- Jeff Garzik | Dinner is ready when Building 1024 | the smoke alarm goes off. MandrakeSoft | -/usr/games/fortune - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Dan Hollis
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Paul Jakma
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox