Hi Doug, On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com> wrote: > Nice catch there Bart. That was well before my role as maintainer and > so settles things well enough for me. IOW, I don't feel I need to worry > about trying to maintain the dual license nature of the RDMA stack as it > was broken long before I took over. Thanks for pointing that out. >
Does it mean we can submit new code files under GPL only license? I submitted RDMA cgroup related code in ib_core under GPLv2 only license. Existing files which are calling those new APIs will continue to be dual license (similar to CQ and RDMA APIs)? Parav
