On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:53:00PM -0400, David Long wrote: > From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.pra...@gmail.com> > + > +static bool __kprobes aarch64_insn_is_steppable(u32 insn)
Could we add more comment for this function? In the comment, we can tell that which type of instructions are steppable, which are not. > +{ > + if (aarch64_get_insn_class(insn) == AARCH64_INSN_CLS_BR_SYS) { > + if (aarch64_insn_is_branch(insn) || > + aarch64_insn_is_msr_imm(insn) || > + aarch64_insn_is_msr_reg(insn) || > + aarch64_insn_is_exception(insn)) > + return false; > + > + if (aarch64_insn_is_mrs(insn)) > + return aarch64_insn_extract_system_reg(insn) > + != AARCH64_INSN_SPCLREG_DAIF; > + > + if (aarch64_insn_is_hint(insn)) > + return aarch64_insn_is_nop(insn); > + > + return true; > + } > + > + if (aarch64_insn_uses_literal(insn) || > + aarch64_insn_is_exclusive(insn)) > + return false; > + > + return true; Thanks Huang Shijie