On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:53:00PM -0400, David Long wrote:
> From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.pra...@gmail.com>
> +
> +static bool __kprobes aarch64_insn_is_steppable(u32 insn)

Could we add more comment for this function? In the comment, we can tell
that which type of instructions are steppable, which are not.

> +{
> +     if (aarch64_get_insn_class(insn) == AARCH64_INSN_CLS_BR_SYS) {
> +             if (aarch64_insn_is_branch(insn) ||
> +                 aarch64_insn_is_msr_imm(insn) ||
> +                 aarch64_insn_is_msr_reg(insn) ||
> +                 aarch64_insn_is_exception(insn))
> +                     return false;
> +
> +             if (aarch64_insn_is_mrs(insn))
> +                     return aarch64_insn_extract_system_reg(insn)
> +                          != AARCH64_INSN_SPCLREG_DAIF;
> +
> +             if (aarch64_insn_is_hint(insn))
> +                     return aarch64_insn_is_nop(insn);
> +
> +             return true;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (aarch64_insn_uses_literal(insn) ||
> +         aarch64_insn_is_exclusive(insn))
> +             return false;
> +
> +     return true;

Thanks
Huang Shijie

Reply via email to