On 05/12/2016 06:20 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 10-05-16 09:35:56, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
index 570383a41853..0cb09714d960 100644
--- a/include/linux/gfp.h
+++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
@@ -256,8 +256,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
#define GFP_HIGHUSER (GFP_USER | __GFP_HIGHMEM)
#define GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE (GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_MOVABLE)
#define GFP_TRANSHUGE ((GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE | __GFP_COMP | \
- __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN) & \
- ~__GFP_RECLAIM)
+ __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN) & ~__GFP_RECLAIM)
I am not sure this is the right thing to do. I think we should keep
__GFP_NORETRY and clear it where we want a stronger semantic. This is
just too suble that all callsites are doing the right thing.
That would complicate alloc_hugepage_direct_gfpmask() a bit, but if you
think it's worth it, I can turn the default around, OK.
