On 05/09, Eric Anholt wrote: > If the firmware had set up a clock to source from PLLC, go along with > it. But if we're looking for a new parent, we don't want to switch it > to PLLC because the firmware will force PLLC (and thus the AXI bus > clock) to different frequencies during over-temp/under-voltage, > without notification to Linux. > > On my system, this moves the Linux-enabled HDMI state machine and DSI1 > escape clock over to plld_per from pllc_per. EMMC still ends up on > pllc_per, because the firmware had set it up to use that.
Is it ok for EMMC rate to change with over-temp/under-voltage? The description makes it sound like PLLC is for clks that want to run at some system bus rate and they don't care about exact frequencies. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> > Fixes: 41691b8862e2 ("clk: bcm2835: Add support for programming the audio > domain clocks") > diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c > index 1091012ecec6..1d8f29ea9f69 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c > @@ -1008,16 +1008,28 @@ static int bcm2835_clock_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > return 0; > } > > +static bool > +bcm2835_clk_is_pllc(struct clk_hw *hw) > +{ > + if (!hw) > + return false; > + > + return strncmp(clk_hw_get_name(hw), "pllc", 4) == 0; This strcmp is not great. Any chance we could look for the parent by reading the hardware and knowing what bit corresponds to pllc as a parent? That would be much nicer so that we don't rely on string comparisons for something the hardware can tell us. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project