On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:07:51 +0300
Evgeniy Dushistov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In blocks reallocation function sometimes does not update some
> of buffer_head::b_blocknr, which may and cause data damage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
>
> Index: linux-2.6.20-rc5/fs/ufs/balloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.20-rc5.orig/fs/ufs/balloc.c
> +++ linux-2.6.20-rc5/fs/ufs/balloc.c
> @@ -231,10 +231,10 @@ static void ufs_change_blocknr(struct in
> unsigned int count, unsigned int oldb,
> unsigned int newb, struct page *locked_page)
> {
> - unsigned int blk_per_page = 1 << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - inode->i_blkbits);
> - struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> + const unsigned mask = (1 << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - inode->i_blkbits)) - 1;
> + struct address_space * const mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> pgoff_t index, cur_index;
> - unsigned int i, j;
> + unsigned i, pos, j;
> struct page *page;
> struct buffer_head *head, *bh;
>
> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void ufs_change_blocknr(struct in
>
> cur_index = locked_page->index;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < count; i += blk_per_page) {
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i = (i | mask) + 1) {
This is a funny looking thing. As far as I can tell, this is a more
complicated way of doing the same thing as the old code did.
Am I missing something?
> index = (baseblk+i) >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - inode->i_blkbits);
>
> if (likely(cur_index != index)) {
> @@ -256,21 +256,32 @@ static void ufs_change_blocknr(struct in
> } else
> page = locked_page;
>
> - j = i;
> head = page_buffers(page);
> bh = head;
> + pos = i & mask;
And this is equivalent to
pos = 0;
?
> + for (j = 0; j < pos; ++j)
> + bh = bh->b_this_page;
> + j = 0;
> do {
> - if (likely(bh->b_blocknr == j + oldb && j < count)) {
> - unmap_underlying_metadata(bh->b_bdev,
> - bh->b_blocknr);
> - bh->b_blocknr = newb + j++;
> - mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
> + if (buffer_mapped(bh)) {
> + pos = bh->b_blocknr - oldb;
> + if (pos < count) {
> + UFSD(" change from %llu to %llu\n",
> + (unsigned long long)pos + odlb,
> + (unsigned long long)pos + newb);
> + bh->b_blocknr = newb + pos;
> + unmap_underlying_metadata(bh->b_bdev,
> +
> bh->b_blocknr);
> + mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
> + ++j;
> + }
> }
>
> bh = bh->b_this_page;
> } while (bh != head);
>
> - set_page_dirty(page);
> + if (j)
> + set_page_dirty(page);
>
> if (likely(cur_index != index))
> ufs_put_locked_page(page);
> @@ -418,14 +429,14 @@ unsigned ufs_new_fragments(struct inode
> }
> result = ufs_alloc_fragments (inode, cgno, goal, request, err);
> if (result) {
> + ufs_clear_frags(inode, result + oldcount, newcount - oldcount,
> + locked_page != NULL);
> ufs_change_blocknr(inode, fragment - oldcount, oldcount, tmp,
> result, locked_page);
>
> *p = cpu_to_fs32(sb, result);
> *err = 0;
> UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag = max_t(u32, UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag,
> fragment + count);
> - ufs_clear_frags(inode, result + oldcount, newcount - oldcount,
> - locked_page != NULL);
> unlock_super(sb);
> if (newcount < request)
> ufs_free_fragments (inode, result + newcount, request -
> newcount);
> --
> /Evgeniy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
