On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:57:21AM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn...@kernel.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:27:03PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: >> >> Shawn, >> >> What's your suggestion? >> > >> > I think this needs more discussion, and I just dropped Stefan's patch >> > from my tree. >> > >> > We need to firstly understand why this is happening. The .prepare hook >> > is defined to be non-atomic context, and so that we call sleep function >> > in there. We did everything right. Why are we getting the warning? If >> > I'm correct, this warning only happens on i.MX7D. Why is that? >> > >> >> Why Stefan's patch works (checking irqs_disabled()) is because during kernel >> time init, the irq is still not enabled. It fixes the issue indirectly. >> See: >> asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void) >> { >> /* >> * Set up the scheduler prior starting any interrupts (such as the >> * timer interrupt). Full topology setup happens at smp_init() >> * time - but meanwhile we still have a functioning scheduler. >> */ >> sched_init(); >> ............. >> time_init(); >> .............. >> WARN(!irqs_disabled(), "Interrupts were enabled early\n"); >> early_boot_irqs_disabled = false; >> local_irq_enable(); >> } >> >> The issue can only happen when PLL enable causes a schedule during >> imx_clock_init(). >> Not all PLL has this issue. >> The issue happens on MX7D pll_audio_main_clk/pll_video_main_clk >> which requires more delay time and cause usleep. >> Because clk framework does not support MX7D clock types (operation requires >> parents on), we simply enable all clocks in imx7d_clocks_init(). >> >> If apply my this patch series: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/20/199 >> The issue can also be gone. > > Thanks for the info. It sounds like that we are fixing the problem in > the wrong place, i.e. clk_pllv3_prepare(). The function does nothing > wrong, since the .prepare hook is defined to be one that can sleep. If > we see sleep warning in a context calling clk_prepare(), that probably > means we shouldn't make the function call from that context. >
Yes, i agree. I'm trying to get rid of these calls. Simply remove them or delay to arch_init will cause kernel fail to boot. Still checking the root cause. > Shawn Regards Dong Aisheng