On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:23:58PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > >> Hence removing support for the parts which are broken rather than > >> pretending to support it and giving incorrect data. > > > > Uh what, how about attempt to fix it? > > No hope to do that by 4.6 release ... so I suggested to Vikas that it would > be better to disable > the feature now so users wouldn't be confused by the random numbers that > they'll see if > they try to do this.
Of course, that might have been useful information to have in the changelog to begin with. But seeing that its been broken for a number of releases I don't see how this is urgent to stuff in this one. I'd instead be more inclined to hurry with Stephanes patches..