On 22-04-16, 08:41, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > I was mainly thinking about kernel size.
Ahh, I see.. > If this is done once per boot, the array should be __initconst, > (looking at the code > in next) which is fine as cpufreq_dt_platdev_init() is already __init. Sure, makes sense.. I will do that as a separate patch. Though just to correct what I earlier said, if cpufreq-dt is developed as a module, its done once per module insertion :) -- viresh
