On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 12:30 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:13:38AM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> > Use WFE to avoid most spinning with MCS spinlocks. This is implemented
> > with the new cmpwait() mechanism for comparing and waiting for the MCS
> > locked value to change using LDXR + WFE.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.l...@hp.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h 
> > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..d295d9d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> > +#ifndef __ASM_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
> > +#define __ASM_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
> > +
> > +#define arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(l)                                    
> > \
> > +do {                                                                       
> > \
> > +   int locked_val;                                                 \
> > +   for (;;) {                                                      \
> > +           locked_val = READ_ONCE(*l);                             \
> > +           if (locked_val)                                         \
> > +                   break;                                          \
> > +           cmpwait(l, locked_val);                                 \
> > +   }                                                               \
> > +   smp_rmb();                                                      \
> > +} while (0)
> 
> If you make the generic version use smp_cond_load_acquire() this isn't
> needed.

Yup, in the email thread about modifying the generic version to use
smp_cond_load_acquire(), I mentioned that overriding it in arch/arm64
would not be needed anymore.

Will made a suggestion about overriding it on arm64, but it turns out he
was just referring to avoiding the immediate dependency on
smp_cond_load_acquire().

Thanks,
Jason

Reply via email to