On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:48:23AM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 03:11:54PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:28:49PM -0700, Steve Muckle wrote: > > > I think I follow - Leo please correct me if I mangle your intentions. > > > It's an issue that Morten and Dietmar had mentioned to me as well. > > Yes. We have been working on this issue for a while without getting to a > nice solution yet. So do you want a "flat hirarchy" for util_avg - just do util_avg for rq and task respectively? Seems it is what you want, and it is even easier?
Thanks, Yuyang