On 1.4.2016 4:06, js1...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
> 
> There is a system that node's pfn are overlapped like as following.
> 
> -----pfn-------->
> N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2
> 
> Therefore, we need to care this overlapping when iterating pfn range.
> 
> There are one place in page_owner.c that iterates pfn range and
> it doesn't consider this overlapping. Add it.
> 
> Without this patch, above system could over count early allocated
> page number before page_owner is activated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>

> ---
>  mm/page_owner.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_owner.c b/mm/page_owner.c
> index ac3d8d1..438768c 100644
> --- a/mm/page_owner.c
> +++ b/mm/page_owner.c
> @@ -301,6 +301,9 @@ static void init_pages_in_zone(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct 
> zone *zone)
>  
>                       page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>  
> +                     if (page_zone(page) != zone)
> +                             continue;
> +
>                       /*
>                        * We are safe to check buddy flag and order, because
>                        * this is init stage and only single thread runs.
> 

Reply via email to