On 1.4.2016 4:06, js1...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
> 
> There is a system that node's pfn are overlapped like as following.
> 
> -----pfn-------->
> N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2
> 
> Therefore, we need to care this overlapping when iterating pfn range.
> 
> mark_free_pages() iterates requested zone's pfn range and unset
> all range's bitmap first. And then it marks freepages in a zone
> to the bitmap. If there is an overlapping zone, above unset could
> clear previous marked bit and reference to this bitmap in the future
> will cause the problem. To prevent it, this patch adds a zone check
> in mark_free_pages().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>

> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 0cfee62..437a934 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2156,6 +2156,10 @@ void mark_free_pages(struct zone *zone)
>       for (pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn; pfn < max_zone_pfn; pfn++)
>               if (pfn_valid(pfn)) {
>                       page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> +
> +                     if (page_zone(page) != zone)
> +                             continue;
> +
>                       if (!swsusp_page_is_forbidden(page))
>                               swsusp_unset_page_free(page);
>               }
> 

Reply via email to