On 1.4.2016 4:06, js1...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com> > > There is a system that node's pfn are overlapped like as following. > > -----pfn--------> > N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2 > > Therefore, we need to care this overlapping when iterating pfn range. > > mark_free_pages() iterates requested zone's pfn range and unset > all range's bitmap first. And then it marks freepages in a zone > to the bitmap. If there is an overlapping zone, above unset could > clear previous marked bit and reference to this bitmap in the future > will cause the problem. To prevent it, this patch adds a zone check > in mark_free_pages(). > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz> > --- > mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index 0cfee62..437a934 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -2156,6 +2156,10 @@ void mark_free_pages(struct zone *zone) > for (pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn; pfn < max_zone_pfn; pfn++) > if (pfn_valid(pfn)) { > page = pfn_to_page(pfn); > + > + if (page_zone(page) != zone) > + continue; > + > if (!swsusp_page_is_forbidden(page)) > swsusp_unset_page_free(page); > } >