forgot to review acpi update earlier ..

On 22-03-16, 02:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -458,6 +458,43 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cp
>       return result;
>  }
>  
> +unsigned int acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> +                                   unsigned int target_freq)
> +{
> +     struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
> +     struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
> +     struct cpufreq_frequency_table *entry;
> +     unsigned int next_perf_state, next_freq, freq;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Find the closest frequency above target_freq.
> +      *
> +      * The table is sorted in the reverse order with respect to the
> +      * frequency and all of the entries are valid (see the initialization).
> +      */
> +     entry = data->freq_table;
> +     do {
> +             entry++;
> +             freq = entry->frequency;
> +     } while (freq >= target_freq && freq != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END);

Consider this table:

11000
10000
9000

And a target-freq of 10000.

Wouldn't you end up selecting 11000 ? Or did I misread it ?

> +     entry--;
> +     next_freq = entry->frequency;
> +     next_perf_state = entry->driver_data;
> +
> +     perf = to_perf_data(data);
> +     if (perf->state == next_perf_state) {
> +             if (unlikely(data->resume))
> +                     data->resume = 0;
> +             else
> +                     return next_freq;
> +     }
> +
> +     data->cpu_freq_write(&perf->control_register,
> +                          perf->states[next_perf_state].control);
> +     perf->state = next_perf_state;
> +     return next_freq;
> +}
> +
>  static unsigned long
>  acpi_cpufreq_guess_freq(struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data, unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> @@ -740,6 +777,9 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct
>               goto err_unreg;
>       }
>  
> +     policy->fast_switch_possible = !acpi_pstate_strict &&
> +             !(policy_is_shared(policy) && policy->shared_type != 
> CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY);
> +
>       data->freq_table = kzalloc(sizeof(*data->freq_table) *
>                   (perf->state_count+1), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!data->freq_table) {
> @@ -874,6 +914,7 @@ static struct freq_attr *acpi_cpufreq_at
>  static struct cpufreq_driver acpi_cpufreq_driver = {
>       .verify         = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
>       .target_index   = acpi_cpufreq_target,
> +     .fast_switch    = acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch,
>       .bios_limit     = acpi_processor_get_bios_limit,
>       .init           = acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init,
>       .exit           = acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit,

-- 
viresh

Reply via email to