On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:58:31 +0900 Minchan Kim <minc...@kernel.org> wrote:
> <b430e9d1c6d4> "remove compressed copy from zram in-memory" > applied swap_slot_free_notify call in *end_swap_bio_read* to > remove duplicated memory between zram and memory. > > However, with introducing rw_page in zram <8c7f01025f7b> > "zram: implement rw_page operation of zram", it became void > because rw_page doesn't need bio. > > This patch restores the function for rw_page. This is a bit mysterious. What is the actual runtime effect of the patch? I assume that 8c7f01025f7b caused duplication of memory and that the only problem is additional resource consumption? If so, what are the observable effects? etcetera, please.