On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Rajesh Bhagat wrote: > I agree to your point. Actually the intent was to check the return status of > reset_device which > is currently being ignored. I encountered the reset_device failure case in > resume operation (STR) > which is increasing the time of resume and causing unexpected crashes if > return value is not checked. > > Do you agree it should be checked here? If yes, I can rework this patch.
I don't know. You should ask the xHCI maintainter, Mathias. Alan Stern
