Em Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:16:23PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:45:22PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:38:15AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu: > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:25:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Which is different from what the kernel does in its main Makefile:
> > # Make variables (CC, etc...) > > AS = $(CROSS_COMPILE)as > > LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > > CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > > I wonder if we could settle in one of these styles or if there is really > > a reason to be creative :-) > > Better, all this could go to tools/scripts/Makefile.include? > Yeah, I agree that it would be good to come up with a common and > consistent approach tools-wide if possible. <SNOP> > So 'allow-override' would probably be a good option. Humm, my preference is to make tools/ look like the kernel, and the kernel doesn't use that allow-override thing, right? So perhaps add what is missing to make it look exactly like the kernel and then ditch this allow-override thing? What about having all this in a single place in tools/script/? - Arnaldo
