On Tue, 08 Mar 2016, Kieran Bingham wrote: > On 8 Mar 2016 11:22, "Lee Jones" <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Kieran Bingham wrote: > > > > > Hi Wolfram, > > > > > > On 9 October 2015 at 22:16, Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > As said to Kieran personally in Dublin, I want a verification that all > > > > binding methods still work, especially runtime instantiation for > drivers > > > > without i2c_device_ids. > > > > > > Ok, I should be able to find some time to look at that this week. > > > > > > > Also, for the last patch, a verification should > > > > be done if the drivers i2c_device_id hasn't been used meanwhile. > > > > > > I'll see what I can do ... > > > > > > > I'd also like to see 'probe_new' instead of 'probe2' for the new > function > > > > name. That should be it. > > > > > > Ok, obviously this is only a temporary naming so I don't mind either > way, > > > I'll do a rename for the next version > > > > > > I've also just found a compile failure to fix up on !CONFIG_OF, this > > > can make its way into the respin. > > > > I still don't see this upstream. What's the latest status? > > Needs correct testing: > "verification that all binding methods still work, especially runtime > instantiation for drivers without i2c_device_ids." > > Actually I rebased this set last week. I was going to try and see if I can > test in qemu. Just need to work out how to load DT fragments at runtime.
Sounds like an over-the-top solution. Can't you just modprobe some modules? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
