On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Haggai Eran <hagg...@mellanox.com> wrote:
> On 28/02/2016 16:13, Parav Pandit wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>> b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>> index 00da80e..54ea8ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>> @@ -343,28 +343,38 @@ int ib_register_device(struct ib_device *device,
>>
>> ret = read_port_immutable(device);
>> if (ret) {
>> - printk(KERN_WARNING "Couldn't create per port immutable data
>> %s\n",
>> - device->name);
>> + pr_warn("Couldn't create per port immutable data %s\n",
>> + device->name);
>> goto out;
>
> This change doesn't belong in the patch.
I agree, but few warnings are with pr_warn and few with printk just
make code look uneven.
So I changed printk to pr_warn in same function instead of spinning
complete new patch.
