On 02/11/2016 04:03 AM, Jan Kara wrote: > On Wed 10-02-16 21:45:05, Steve Kenton wrote: >> On 02/10/2016 08:19 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 05:56:16PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> [add Jan Kara] >>>> >>>> On 02/10/16 13:29, Steve Kenton wrote: >>>>> Is anyone maintaining these or am I about to volunteer for another job? >> >> I guess I should have said "developing" rather than "maintaining" for >> fs/udf since it's clear that someone has been keeping it running in-tree. >> I started with udftools from source forge and then discovered that the >> kernel udf driver does not support fallocate() which I was hoping to use. >> >> Thanks for the pointer to Jan Kara. I'll see how he feels about patches >> from the wilderness. > > So I don't have too much time for UDF. That's why I mostly fix bugs someone > reports, occasionally improve stuff or review patches others send but I > don't have time for development of new features for UDF.
OK, I'll see what I can do and try not to bother you until stuff is working well. > >>>> CUrrent MAINTAINERS file says: >>>> >>>> UDF FILESYSTEM >>>> M: Jan Kara <j...@suse.com> >>>> S: Maintained >>>> F: Documentation/filesystems/udf.txt >>>> F: fs/udf/ >>>> >>>> and that Doc. file says: >>>> >>>> For the latest version and toolset see: >>>> http://linux-udf.sourceforge.net/ >> >> Yes, that's where I started. The last release was 1.0.0b3 in 2004. >> Which is what the Ubuntu 14.04LTS package reports as it's version too. > > Pali Rohar has recently startted a repo on github for udftools. It is at > https://github.com/pali/udftools > > So userspace patches go to him. Perfect! All of my googling pointed to source forge but this is what I was hoping for. smk > > Honza >
