2016-02-09 16:06+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 09/02/2016 14:55, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> This is most likely going to bug on the following path:
>>   handle_apic_access -> kvm_lapic_set_eoi
>> 
>> Before the change, handle_apic_access would just drop EOIs that should
>> have gone to user space ... I'm not sure if we tested it, or the path is
>> really never taken.
> 
> cpu_need_virtualize_apic_accesses is needed to set
> SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES (vmx_secondary_exec_control) and
> SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES is required to get to
> handle_apic_access.

Thanks,

Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>

Reply via email to